The Last Jedi and the 3 Readings

So I’ve come across, generally, three ways of reflecting on The Last Jedi. (If I may be so bold, it almost seems like the breakdown of readings of Vatican II).

Firstly, the Liberal – “The Last Jedi changed everything, overthrowing what came before, and ringing in a new age of Star Wars storytelling which isn’t weighed down with the worn out ideals of the past. It should be celebrated!”

These are the ones who think the ideals and values present in the film – the primacy of wise women over foolish or weak men, the questioning of traditional practices, the skepticism of masculine heroism, the presence of a diverse cast, the ‘breaking of the cycle’ – have made this film a kind of rally cry for more modern values. Read almost any bit of positive commentary and the story’s ideas will be the strongest argument for its status as “a good movie”.

It should be recognized that these are most likely to be “right-side of history” folks of various stripes. They want the old order, to varying degrees, to be done away with, and a new order, often of egalitarianism, relativism, and feminism (of a certain sort), to be put in its place.

Secondly, the Reactionary – “The Last Jedi changed everything, overthrowing what came before, and ringing in a dark age of Star Wars storytelling which is defined by a rejection of perennial values in favor of the modern agenda. It should be condemned!”

These are the ones who see in the film a break with the past. Tradition, in the person of Luke, seems to be given short shrift. The heroism of the past films is made to look foolish in a hamfisted manner. The old characters are killed off without handing much of anything off. Story and character choices appear to be agenda rather than plot driven.

It should be recognized that these tend to be “wrong-side of history” folks – from Conservatives, to Altright, to Reactionary Traditionalists. They want to either keep the current order in place or return to an order more grounded in tradition.

Thirdly, the Hermeneutic of Continuity – “The Last Jedi has some ambiguity in it’s treatment of traditional values and includes more modern sensibilities. We should welcome its challenge to refining and reaffirming the traditional values in light of the modern situation.”

I’ve only met one person espousing this, really, and not online. He made a cogent argument for the movie’s strengths even among its weaknesses (e.g. the whole Finn and Rose subplot). On the matter of, say Luke’s plot, one must lean in to Luke’s despair – he is seeing everything he’s worked for fall apart, he feels abandoned by the Force, he feels like this is just a cyclical pattern, he can’t overcome his attachment to the Jedi ways which only exacerbates the despair – and so his tale becomes one of trying to find a way out of despair. His first choice is just waiting for death, but by the end he is given a new way out in self-immolation as a sign of hope for others. Theoretically, you could do the same sort of lean-in for much of the rest of the film.

This is basically an attempt to rise above the ideological commentary of the film and to allow the traditions and values of the past to fill in the connections and plotholes and so become the guiding light on that which appears new. This is a typical practice in large paradoxical canons (see Marvel or DC) or religions founded upon textual continuity (see Catholicism).

It’s a reading I’m sympathetic toward – it’s animated by great optimism. If TLJ was a religious text, I’d basically read it as such. That’s by and large how I read Vatican II and certain recent comments by the Holy Father.

But TLJ is not a religious text. It’s formed by its cultural milieu and is similarly attempting to form that milieu. Ideology cannot be separated out so neatly, especially on a cultural artifact of this scale and where one’s ideological opponents won’t do so. Reading 3 is aligned with 2 insofar as it is not progressive but conservative and traditional, and so is an opponent of 1.

Upshot to all this reflecting – our discussions of The Last Jedi aren’t about The Last Jedi. They’re about who we are and who we are seeking to be – traditional (which the OT and Prequels fundamentally were) or liberal-progressive (which the sequels seem to be embracing).

So I exercise my right be a reactionary. Ultima Jedae delenda est.

Advertisements

About Tomas

Catholic. Texan. Philistine. Teacher.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to The Last Jedi and the 3 Readings

  1. MishaBurnett says:

    My issues with The Last Jedi are purely mechanical–the plot doesn’t make sense logically. It’s bad storytelling.

  2. Nixon says:

    I’d be okay with the idea of Luke being turned into a bitter old man IF there had been a good reason for it instead of the stupid “then I thought I’d murder my nephew but changed my mind but it was too late so I just gave up on everything.”

    As for him dying pointlessly, there’s nothing that would actually make me like this movie but I think it would have been slightly better if it turned out the Luke had been dead the whole time. That would explain why he could project himself across space like that because he was always a force ghost! But that wouldn’t have worked with the bitter old man angle.

    With the prequels I can think of things to do which would make them better, but with TLJ even the cool things I think of to add or change ultimately don’t help. It’s simply a bad movie. You’d have to trash the whole thing and start over.

  3. Pingback: Star Wars and the Hermeneutic of Continuity: A Random Day’s Post | The War for Christendom

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s